Area: Policy and financing
A universal definition of social housing is difficult, as it is a country-specific and locally contextualised topic (Braga & Palvarini, 2013). This review of the concept focuses on social housing in the context of the UK from the late 1980s, which Malpass (2005) refers to as the phase of ‘restructuring the housing and welfare state’, to the early 2000s, known as the phase of the ‘new organisation of social housing’.
In response to previous demands for housing, such as those arising during the Industrial Revolution, and recognising the persistent need to address the substandard quality of housing provided by private landlords in the UK (Scanlon et al., 2015), the primary objective of social housing has historically been to enhance the overall health conditions of workers and low-income populations (Malpass, 2014; Scanlon et al., 2015). However, this philanthropic approach to social housing changed after the Second World War when it became a key instrument to address the housing demand crisis. Private initiatives, housing associations, cooperatives and local governments then became responsible for providing social housing (Carswell, 2012; Scanlon et al., 2015).
Social housing in the UK can be viewed from two perspectives: the legal and the academic (Granath Hansson & Lundgren, 2019). Along these two perspectives, social housing is often analysed based on four main criteria: the legal status of the landlord or provider, the tenancy system or tenure, the funding mechanism or subsidies, and the target group or beneficiaries (Braga & Palvarini, 2013; Carswell, 2012; Granath Hansson & Lundgren, 2019).
From a legal perspective, social housing maintained its original goals of affordability and accessibility during the restructuring period in the late 1980s. However, citing the economic crisis, the responsibility for developing social housing shifted from local authorities to non-municipal providers with highly regulated practices aligned with the managerialist approach of the welfare state (Granath Hansson & Lundgren, 2019; Malpass, 2005; Malpass & Victory, 2010). Despite the several housing policy reviews and government changes, current definitions of social housing have maintained the same approach as during the restructuring period. Section 68 of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, updated in 2017, defines social housing as low-cost accommodation provided to people whose rental or ownership needs are not met by the commercial market (HoC, 2008; 2017, pp. 50-51). The Regulator of Social Housing, formerly the Homes and Communities Agency, has adopted the earlier definition of social housing and clarified which organisations provide it across the UK. These organisations include local authorities, not-for-profit housing associations, cooperatives, and for-profit organisations (RSH, 2021). In contrast, the National Housing Federation emphasises the affordability of social housing regardless of the type of tenure or provider (NHF, 2021).
From an academic perspective, Malpass (2005) explains that during the restructuring phase, social housing was defined as a welfare-supported service – although it did have limitations, which meant that funding principles shifted from general subsidy to means-tested support for housing costs only, which later formed the basis for the Right to Buy Act introduced by the Thatcher government in the early 1980s (Malpass, 2005, 2008). The restructuring phase, however, came as a response to the housing 'bifurcation' process that began in the mid-1970s and accelerated sharply from the 1980s to 1990s (Kleinman et al., 1998; Malpass, 2005). During this phase, the role of social housing in the housing system was predominantly residual, with greater emphasis placed on market-based solutions, and social housing ownership concerned both local authorities and housing associations (Malpass & Victory, 2010). This mix has influenced the perception of social housing in the 'new organisation' phase as a framework that regulates public housing intervention for specific groups and focuses on enabling non-municipal providers (Malpass, 2005, 2008; Malpass & Victory, 2010). Currently, as Carswell (2012) explains, social housing plays an important role in nurturing a variety of initiatives aimed at providing ‘good-quality’ and ‘affordable’ housing for vulnerable and low-income groups (Carswell, 2012). Oyebanji (2014) sees social housing as any form of government-regulated housing provided by public institutions, including non-profit organisations (Oyebanji, 2014). Additionally, Bengtsson (2017) describes social housing as a system that aims to provide households with limited means, but only after their need has been confirmed through testing (Bengtsson, B, 2017 as cited in Granath Hansson & Lundgren, 2019).
To a great extent, social housing in the UK can be seen as a service system that is intricately linked to the welfare state and influenced by political, economic, and social components. Despite being somehow determined by common factors and actors, the relationship between social housing and the welfare state can sometimes be complex and subject to fluctuations (Malpass, 2008). In this context, the government plays a vital role in shaping and implementing the mechanisms and practices of social housing.
While the pre-restructuring phase focused on meeting the needs of the people by increasing subsidies and introducing the right to buy (Stamsø, 2010), the aim of the restructuring phase was to meet the needs of the market by promoting economic growth (privatisation, market-oriented policies and reducing the role of local authorities) (Stamsø, 2010; Malpass, 2005) . The new organisational phase, on the other hand, works to meet and balance the needs of all, with people, politics and the economy becoming more intertwined. Welfare reform legislation passed in 2010 aims to enable people to meet their needs, but through 'responsible' subsidies, leading to a new policy stance that has been described as 'neoliberal' thinking (Hickman et al., 2018). However, there are still no strict legal requirements for the organisation and development of social housing as an independent service system, and most of the barriers to development are closely related to the political orientation of the government, rapid changes in housing policy and challenges arising from providers' perceptions of existing housing policy structures (Stasiak et al., 2021).
References
Braga, M., & Palvarini, P. (2013, April 14). Social Housing in the EU. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies.
Bengtsson, B. (2017). Socialbostäder och stigberoende : Varför har vi inte ’social housing’ i Sverige? In Den motspänstiga akademikern: Festskrift till Ingrid Sahlin. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-9009
Carswell, A. T. (2012). The Encyclopedia of Housing (2nd ed., p. 928). SAGE Publications.
Granath Hansson, A., & Lundgren, B. (2019). Defining social housing: A discussion on the suitable criteria. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(2), 149-166.
HoC. (2008, September 2). Housing and Regeneration Act 2008. Lhttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/17/data.pdf
HoC. (2017, April 14). Housing and Regeneration Act 2008. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/17/part/2/chapter/1/crossheading/social-housing
Kleinman, M., Matznetter, W., & Stephens, M. (Eds.) (1998). European integration and housing policy. London: Routledge.
Malpass, P. (2005). Housing and the welfare state: The development of housing policy in Britain: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.
Malpass, P. (2008). Housing and the new welfare state: Wobbly pillar or cornerstone? Housing Studies, 23(1), 1-19.
Malpass, P. (2014). Histories of social housing: a comparative approach. In K. Scanlon, C. Whitehead & M. Fernández Arrigoitia (Eds.), Social housing in Europe, pp. 255-274. John Wiley & Sons.
Malpass, P., & Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 3-18.
NHF. (2021, May 5). About social housing. https://www.housing.org.uk/about-housing-associations/about-social-housing/
Oyebanji, A. O. (2014). Development of a framework for sustainable social housing provision (SSHP) in England (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Lancashire).
RSH. (2021, April 10). Role and fundamental objectives - Social Housing. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/regulator-of-social-housing/about.
Scanlon, K., Fernández Arrigoitia, M., & Whitehead, C. M. (2015). Social housing in Europe. European Policy Analysis(17), 1-12
Created on 17-06-2023 | Update on 20-06-2023
Related definitions
Affordability
Area: Policy and financing
Created on 27-08-2021 | Update on 20-04-2023
Read more ->Housing Retrofit
Area: Design, planning and building
Created on 16-02-2022 | Update on 07-10-2022
Read more ->Housing Governance
Area: Policy and financing
Created on 16-02-2022 | Update on 21-02-2022
Read more ->Housing Regime
Area: Policy and financing
Created on 24-02-2022 | Update on 08-03-2022
Read more ->Asset-based Welfare
Area: Policy and financing
Created on 03-06-2022 | Update on 03-12-2023
Read more ->Indoor Thermal Comfort
Area: Design, planning and building
Created on 20-09-2022 | Update on 01-12-2023
Read more ->Housing Affordability
Area: Design, planning and building
Created on 17-10-2023 | Update on 18-10-2023
Read more ->Related case studies

North Wingfield Road social housing complex.
Created on 25-11-2022

LILAC_Low Impact Living Affordable Community_Leeds
Created on 09-03-2023

HOUSEFUL: Els Mestres, Sabadell
Created on 01-12-2023
Related publications
Alsaeed, M., & Hadjri, K. (2022, August). Environmental sustainability of future social housing. In New Housing Researchers Colloquium (NHRC) at the European Network for Housing Research (ENHR) Conference 2022, Barcelona, Spain.
Posted on 30-08-2022
Conference
Read more ->